You may remember us writing about the ‘diversified’ development, construction and property management business Lend Lease. It was sold out of our model at a price of around $15 from memory and has proceeded to fall a further 33% amid the COVID-19 shutdown. Yet walking around the suburbs it seems that the construction sector is the only one that has not really been impacted by these restrictions. 

An article published in the AFR last week piqued our interest, announcing Lend Lease’s intention to securitise, or on-sell the cash flows expected to be received from pre-sold apartments at their major buildings in Sydney. Confused? Well it seems that Lend Lease has a cash flow issue for its $100bn in work in hand, and is attempting to sell the profits or future settlement from apartments yet to be finished onto an external party to provide short-term fund. In theory it makes sense, you bring forward profits to reinvest into anotehr project; yet we arent operating in normal conditions.

Our concerns

Our original concerns around Lend Lease remain but have since been added to by the incredible events and changes occuring due to the pandemic. We suggested selling the business after they announced a substantial writedown on a number of major projects, due primarily to cost and delivery blowouts; our concern being that this issue was more widespread than it appeared. The company subsequently rallied some 30%, before falling 50% to where it is today.

During this time, management announced the sale of their engineering division to Spanish giant Acciona, but this will actually cost Lend Lease at least $500m, if not $1bn based on the views of some research analysts. Not only did it cost money, but they were required to retain a number of troublesome projects including Melbourne’s own Metro Rail Tunnel which is now at a standstill as negotiations with the Government continue over cost blowouts; sounds all too familiar. More recently, management attempted to sell the Services division, which was previously known to have one of the worst NBN installation contracts, but has since improved; yet the primary bidders in ASX-listed Service Stream pulled out late in 2019.

There is little doubt the company has delivered a strong growth profile, with over $30bn in property assets under management through their funds and a pipeline of some $112bn in residential and commercial property projects across the world. Yet is this area where we are becoming concerned. Lend Lease is increasingly looking like Macquarie Group pre-GFC with a substantial amount of its own capital invested into its projects, meaning when markets fall, as they are now, cash flow, gearing and other pressures increase. Consider for instance that they currently have some 37,000 residential units that need to be sold around the world, in what can only be considered an extremely uncertain environment.

Our biggest concern, however, now lies in the combination of residential and commercial property they manage on behalf of primairly institutional investors like pension funds. Recent superannuation changes and market volatility have seen substantial switches between investment options and demands for increasing transparency on asset valuations in properties just like these. The last few week’s has even seen rare redemption requests for Industry Funds Management direct property options as funds like Host Plus cash up to fund drawdowns. What does this look like for Lend Lease? Will they also need to offer redemption requests, will the values of these assets be reduced, effectively reducing the value of the properties still under construction? Or will borrowing from tomorrow be enough to avert disaster?

Whilst their current debt isnt demanding, falls in revenue across every business unit except low margin construction and cash flow conversion of just 5% should be concerning for investors. In an environment where everything is on sale, we think there is better value with less uncertainty elsewhere.